Skip to content
Mignuti Chatbot

Use case · law firm

Chatbot for law firms — opening hours, fee tables, document checklists — without legal advice

The problem

Paralegals lose a notable share of their day to repetitive intake calls: 'How much does an initial consultation cost?', 'Do you handle traffic-court matters?', 'What documents should I bring?'. Worse, accidental legal advice over phone creates §43a BRAO liability — every paralegal-utterance is a risk.

How Mignuti Chatbot solves it

Upload your fee schedule (RVG-Tabelle), case-areas, document-checklists. Mignuti Chatbot answers 24/7 in 12 languages and is hard-blocked from giving anything that resembles legal advice (Rechtsdienstleistungsgesetz §3 + Berufsordnung §43a BRAO baked into the system prompt). All substantive questions route to 'please book a consultation'. Lead-Capture for hot prospects.

Example questions

FAQ

Can the bot give legal advice?

No — and this is enforced. The system prompt blocks any answer that constitutes Rechtsdienstleistung per RDG §3. Substantive questions ('Will I win?', 'Is this contract valid?', 'Should I sign?') route to 'please book a consultation'. The vertical template ships with content-policy keywords (judgment, claim, lawsuit, contract review) pre-configured.

What about §43a BRAO confidentiality?

Conversations are never used for LLM training. PII redaction (Presidio) strips names, addresses, case numbers before any AI call and any logging. Platform data stays EU-only (Frankfurt); AI responses run via Anthropic (USA, EU-US DPF + EU SCCs). DPA per Art. 28 GDPR with TOMs is downloadable in the dashboard.

Can the bot handle conflicting-mandate intake?

Yes — bot collects opponent name + case-type + relationship via lead-form, your reception runs the Mandantenkonflikt-Check before scheduling. Bot never schedules directly to avoid §43a-BRAO conflicts.